At a Glance
- While the Forester has a slight edge in length and height, both vehicles offer comparable width, indicating a similar stance on the road.
- The Rogue achieves an EPA-estimated 27 mpg in the city and 35 mpg on the highway, while the Forester returns 26 mpg in the city and 33 mpg on the highway.
- The Nissan Rogue and Subaru Forester offer competitive pricing, with the Rogue starting at $26,550 and the Forester starting at $26,395.
In the realm of compact SUVs, two prominent contenders stand out: the Nissan Rogue and the Subaru Forester. Both vehicles have garnered a reputation for their versatility, practicality, and all-around performance. However, prospective buyers often ponder the question: “Is the Nissan Rogue bigger than the Subaru Forester?” This comprehensive comparison delves into the dimensions, interior space, cargo capacity, and other key aspects of these two popular SUVs to provide a definitive answer.
Dimensions: Unveiling the Physical Differences
When it comes to overall dimensions, the Nissan Rogue and Subaru Forester exhibit subtle differences. The Rogue measures 183.5 inches in length, 72.4 inches in width, and 66.5 inches in height, while the Forester comes in at 189.8 inches in length, 72.4 inches in width, and 68.1 inches in height. While the Forester has a slight edge in length and height, both vehicles offer comparable width, indicating a similar stance on the road.
Interior Space: Exploring Comfort and Convenience
Stepping inside the Nissan Rogue and Subaru Forester reveals two distinct approaches to interior design. The Rogue boasts a spacious cabin with ample headroom and legroom for both front and rear passengers. Its seats are well-cushioned and supportive, providing a comfortable ride even on long journeys. The Forester, on the other hand, prioritizes cargo space over passenger comfort, resulting in slightly less legroom in the second row. However, its seats are equally comfortable, and the large windows offer excellent visibility.
Cargo Capacity: Uncovering Storage Potential
When it comes to cargo capacity, the Nissan Rogue and Subaru Forester offer generous space for luggage, groceries, and outdoor gear. With the rear seats up, the Rogue provides 39.3 cubic feet of cargo space, while the Forester offers a slightly larger 35.4 cubic feet. However, folding down the rear seats expands the Rogue’s cargo capacity to an impressive 74.1 cubic feet, surpassing the Forester’s 72.9 cubic feet.
Performance and Handling: Unveiling Driving Dynamics
Both the Nissan Rogue and Subaru Forester offer capable performance and composed handling. The Rogue’s 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine generates 181 horsepower and 181 lb-ft of torque, while the Forester’s 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine produces 182 horsepower and 176 lb-ft of torque. Both vehicles come standard with continuously variable transmissions (CVTs) that provide smooth and efficient shifting. In terms of handling, the Rogue and Forester exhibit similar characteristics, with responsive steering and well-controlled body roll.
Safety Features: Ensuring Peace of Mind
The Nissan Rogue and Subaru Forester prioritize safety, offering a comprehensive suite of advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS). Both vehicles come standard with features such as automatic emergency braking, lane departure warning, and adaptive cruise control. Additionally, the Rogue offers ProPILOT Assist, a semi-autonomous driving system that can control acceleration, braking, and steering on highways. The Forester, on the other hand, features EyeSight, a suite of safety technologies that includes adaptive cruise control with lane centering, lane departure warning, and automatic emergency braking.
Fuel Efficiency: Exploring Economy and Efficiency
When it comes to fuel efficiency, the Nissan Rogue and Subaru Forester offer comparable ratings. The Rogue achieves an EPA-estimated 27 mpg in the city and 35 mpg on the highway, while the Forester returns 26 mpg in the city and 33 mpg on the highway. However, the Forester’s standard all-wheel drive system slightly impacts its fuel economy compared to the Rogue’s front-wheel drive configuration.
Price and Value: Unveiling the Financial Considerations
The Nissan Rogue and Subaru Forester offer competitive pricing, with the Rogue starting at $26,550 and the Forester starting at $26,395. Both vehicles offer a range of trim levels and optional features that can increase the price. However, the Rogue’s top-tier Platinum trim offers more features and amenities than the Forester’s Touring trim, resulting in a higher price point.
The Final Verdict: Unveiling the Superior Choice
The Nissan Rogue and Subaru Forester are both excellent compact SUVs with unique strengths and weaknesses. The Rogue offers a more spacious interior, a larger cargo capacity, and a slightly better fuel economy rating. On the other hand, the Forester provides better off-road capability, a more comprehensive suite of safety features, and a lower starting price. Ultimately, the choice between the Rogue and the Forester depends on individual preferences and priorities. Those seeking a spacious and fuel-efficient SUV with a comfortable interior may prefer the Rogue, while those prioritizing off-road capability, safety features, and value may find the Forester more appealing.
What People Want to Know
Q: Which vehicle has a more comfortable ride quality?
A: Both the Nissan Rogue and Subaru Forester offer comfortable rides, with well-cushioned seats and composed handling. However, some drivers may prefer the Rogue’s slightly softer suspension, which absorbs bumps and road imperfections better.
Q: Which vehicle is better for families?
A: The Nissan Rogue offers a more spacious interior and a larger cargo capacity, making it a better choice for families with children and lots of gear. However, the Subaru Forester‘s standard all-wheel drive system provides better traction and stability in inclement weather, which may be a consideration for families living in snowy or mountainous regions.
Q: Which vehicle is more reliable?
A: Both the Nissan Rogue and Subaru Forester have a reputation for reliability. However, the Forester has consistently ranked higher in reliability surveys, with fewer reported problems and lower repair costs.